If someone can't use your site, they can't be your customer.
An automated first-pass scan, not a full audit. It catches roughly 30-50% of real-world WCAG issues - the mechanical, machine-detectable class - then I review what a scan can't judge on its own.
What it covers
Three phases: an automated scan for the mechanical issues, a manual review for what a scan can't judge, and a report ranked by real impact - not just rule violations.
Automated Accessibility Scan
Missing alt text, insufficient color contrast, ARIA misuse, broken heading structure, and unlabeled form fields - axe-core's WCAG 2.1 AA ruleset, the mechanical checks a machine can verify reliably. This covers roughly 30-50% of real-world WCAG issues, not the full picture.
Manual Usability Review
Keyboard navigation testing, focus order, meaningful link text (not just present alt text, but whether it actually makes sense), logical reading order for screen readers, and form error handling - the judgment calls a scan can't make.
Prioritized Report
Issues ranked by real user impact, not just rule violations, with plain-English fixes you can hand straight to whoever builds your site.
How it runs
Automated tools catch roughly 30-50% of real accessibility issues - the mechanical ones. The judgment calls - meaningful alt text, logical reading order, genuine keyboard usability - still need a person. That's what the manual review is for.
Ready to know who your site is actually leaving out?
Request an assessmentAlready spoken with me about a scan? Submit written authorization to get it scheduled - this comes after that initial conversation, not instead of it.